Argumentative debate against animal testing

And to make sure that these experiments do not cause any harm to precious human life, we have to test them on animals. This point of view suggests that more complicated organisms have richer, Argumentative debate against animal testing fulfilling lives and that it is the richness of the life that actually correlates with moral worth.

Is this a justifiable cost? Most people agree that animals have at least some moral status — that is why it is wrong to abuse pets or needlessly hurt other animals. Is it necessary to carry out animal testing to the great degree that our society does in this day and age?

Many organizations such as PETA fight for increased research into alternative methods of testing so that testing on animals can be alleviated. Quality Guarantee We have an exceptional team of proficient writers with a vast experience in writing quality academic essays. Many people would argue that the amount of animal testing we do is unjustified, because most of it is in fact not for gain to society.

One principle calls for the preferential research use of less complex organisms whenever possible. One common form of this argument claims that moral status comes from the capacity to suffer or to enjoy life.

We have only affordable prices for you, and we offer a quality service. The human moral community, for instance, is often characterized by a capacity to manipulate abstract concepts and by personal autonomy.

Arguments Against Animal Testing That Everyone Should Know About

Blatant consumerism is fueling animal testing, but should the market respond? The health care and commercial industries also turn to animal testing for these reasons.

Utilitarianism argues that we should do the most good that we can do, or if that something is right, it should benefit the majority. To some, these points may seem anti-human; they may come across as the rantings of an animal-obsessed loony.

In modern times, Argumentative debate against animal testing question has shifted from whether animals have moral status to how much moral status they have and what rights come with that status. If animals do not have the same rights as humans, it becomes permissible to use them for research purposes.

Affordable prices Our essay writing service is tailored to fit your budget. In respect to his capacity, many animals are no different than humans. Overall the use of animals for research testing is an old concept and one that has historically been debated. Do all of these things mean that animal testing can reliably continue in this day and age with these things in mind?

Additionally, well designed studies and appropriate statistical analysis of data can minimize the number of animals required for statistically significant results. Nonetheless there are those who argue that the use of animals for testing is an inhumane and cruel practice. When appropriate, anesthesia should be used; additionally, studies should have the earliest possible endpoints after which animals who will subsequently experience disease or suffering can be euthanized.

Therefore, they should have the same moral status and deserve equal treatment. It is up to us, now, to take a stand and side for what is appropriate. Granted, they may be. Providing high quality, disease-free environments for the animals will help ensure that every animal counts.

Our body, to us, is supremely sacred; the temple that safeguards our life. However, we look upon past examples of this behavior as morally condemnable.

That is the wake-up call of this generation. Although a moral community could theoretically include animals, it frequently does not. It has passed all the trials, on the basis of which it has been deemed safe for human consumption. Animal Testing is Not Our Last and Only Hope "If possessing a higher degree of intelligence does not entitle one human to use another for his or her own ends, how can it entitle humans to exploit non-humans?

Does it even make sense? It is argued that animal testing saves many lives and there is no alternative to testing on a living organism. A great resource describing some ways to minimize the use of animals in research and to practice the best standards when using animals.

Best essay writers You will not find competent and certified essay writers like the ones on our spectacular team. If we discriminate on grounds of species, we are essentially saying that one species is better than another and that it deserves less consideration than another, but can this really be justified?

Against Animal Testing Essay

Research tests conducted on living animals have been practiced since BC.Oct 23,  · Animal testing is the use of animals in biological, medical, and psychological studies.

Human beings and many animals have similar organ systems and body processes. Experiments on animals help scientists increase knowledge about the way the human body works. DR Bella Williams is head of engagement at charity Understanding Animal Research. "Medical and scientific organisations around the world agree that animals are essential in scientific research, for developing medicines and safety testing.

"We rely on animal research to. Aren't there rules, regulations, and laws that govern animal testing?

For and against: Animal testing

No, there aren't! There is no experiment under the U.S. Animal Welfare Act that is prohibited, which means that animals can be isolated, starved, electrocuted, poisoned, drugged, and even killed (if it survives this ordeal).

On closer scrutiny, there exists a wide range of positions on the debate over the ethics of animal testing.

Animal Testing

The two views mentioned above represent two common positions at the opposing ends of the spectrum. Others endorse a view closer to the middle of the spectrum.

The health care and commercial industries also turn to animal testing for these reasons. While some contest the use of animals for animal testing it is not a new idea.

Research tests conducted on living animals have been practiced since BC. Nonetheless there are those who argue that the use of animals for testing is an inhumane and cruel practice.

Arguments against animal testing Animal experiments are cruel, unreliable, and even dangerous The harmful use of animals in experiments is not only cruel but also often ineffective.

Argumentative debate against animal testing
Rated 0/5 based on 62 review