Explain Viewpoint You Actually Disagree With Outline which sources back up this view Explain their views Cross-reference between the sources to highlight similarities in view Paragraph 2: Do this directly here.
Use NOP a lot here — the point of this paragraph is to evaluate and examine closer the sources used in the previous paragraph.
Whether you can understand the sources and evaluate them. Evaluation of Sources in Paragraph 1 This is where you use NOP to undermine the hell out of the sources that disagree with your viewpoint OR try to show that one source, when examined further, actually proves the view you agree with.
This is a tougher structure to master, but it works like a charm. Somewhat important Which is more reliable? And how should you approach the paper generally? It can be inefficient. Source-By-Source Outline which sources support the hypothesis i.
It unleashes your ability to make complex arguments. This means you talk about the view you think is wrong. Summarise your overall argument, and tie your points together. The structure for A is very different from that of B, which requires you to use all 4 or 3 sources to derive a conclusion to a question.
If you think they mostly agree, then quickly highlight the differences between both sources in your first point instead.
Outline the disagreement, explain their positions quickly, then use some NOP to evaluate and explain. You first spend a paragraph explaining the views espoused by the sources.
Your next paragraph is where you really milk the whole NOP thing. Secondly, point out some brief NOP e. So, what structure should you use?
There are usually links between sources, and if you go through each source individually, your structure may prohibit you from more complex argumentation. Outline, explain, and cross-reference to show you understand the overarching idea these sources are trying to espouse.
So if you wish to conclude that overall, the sources disagree with the hypothesis, then discuss the agreements first.
Explain Viewpoint of Sources You Agree with Outline which sources back up this view Explain their views Cross-reference between the sources to highlight similarities in view Try to cross-reference even the sources from Paragraph 1 to show overall agreement towards your main conclusion Paragraph 4: This time, you agree with the sources, so use NOP to explain why you think they are relatively more credible than the sources you disagree with.
Next, you do the whole explaining thing again, but for the remaining sources that agree with you. Most important Why do they agree or disagree? Advantages of this structure:How to Write a Great Essay for Different A-Level Subjects | 3 comments. In previous articles, we’ve given you lots of advice on how to write the perfect essay.
A good history essay makes connections between what’s been written about, considering how issues interrelate, so think about how what you’re writing about ties in with other. Oct 26, · Firstly, the most important difference between GCSE and A Level History is that you are negatively marked for any irrelevant information - therefore try to make sure that your essay is tightly argued and is focused.
For A-level you need to make this a little more sophisticated- if you can, bring in other historians’ opinions. For example, a really good essay structure is to explain why a particular historian or group of historians think a certain way, explain how these views could be challenged, and then put forward your own opinion on the issue.
This CIE History revision guide will help you answer those questions.
Let’s start with a few basic tips then explore how you can structure your answer to the CIE Source Paper. Tip: If you’re looking for advice on Paper 2, I suggest this. Unfortunately, a good essay does not just consist of writing all you know about a given topic; at A-level examiners tend to insist on tricky things like answering the question, analysis rather than narrative and including information to support your point of view.
For example, history really good essay structure is to explain why a particular historian or group of historians level a certain way, explain how these views could be challenged, and then put forward your own opinion on the issue.Download